Organizational Trust Knows No Size
The following case study gives insights into the reality that trust and effectiveness is not affected by the size of a company but about its capacity and ability focus on the things that truly matter.
Rebuilding Trust and Alignment in a Fractured IT Leadership Team
Company: Major International Automotive Manufacturer (Anonymous)
Location: Southeastern United States
Industry: Automotive Manufacturing
Situation
The IT department, consisting of over 70 employees and 6 senior executives including the CIO, faced deep internal challenges. The leadership team was fractured, communication was poor, and silos had formed across business units. At the same time, the company was preparing to enter the electric vehicle (EV) market and was experiencing significant supplier issues, resulting in millions of dollars in unfinished product losses daily.
These pressures amplified the urgency for the CIO to create stability and support the CEO’s efforts to recover financial losses. Within IT, trust was low, responsiveness to business needs was slow, and morale was declining. The primary objective was to align the IT leadership, improve communication, and drive stronger execution toward department KPIs.
Habits
The department’s habits reflected a culture of blame, strategic misalignment, and internal competition. Meetings were long, unproductive, and often dominated by defensive posturing rather than collaboration.
An undercurrent of fear and frustration was present throughout the organization, with generational divides—between traditional leadership styles and newer, more agile approaches—adding to the tension. Misaligned goals, inconsistent values, and differing problem-solving methods kept the team from operating cohesively.
Insights
Gaining traction with the IT leadership team presented a significant challenge. Time and attention from the senior leaders were limited due to operational pressures, and accessibility was inconsistent.
Despite the internal dysfunction, the external business demands remained relentless. Any intervention needed to be sharply focused, flexible enough to adapt to changing priorities, and practical in a way that the leadership could immediately apply.
It became clear early that deep-seated cultural divides—not just tactical inefficiencies—were at the root of the issues. Without addressing these underlying dynamics, any strategic or procedural improvements would fail to stick.
Formulation
The approach needed to balance strategic development with immediate culture repair. The following steps were implemented:
- Root Values Analysis: One-on-one sessions with leadership uncovered significant value system misalignments that had never been formally addressed. Clarifying these differences allowed for more realistic goal-setting and leadership expectations moving forward.
- Structured Communication Frameworks: New communication pathways were established across previously siloed teams. Regular, structured meetings with clear agendas and expectations replaced the previous ad hoc, unproductive conversations.
- Effective Meeting Redesign: Meetings were streamlined to be outcome-driven, time-bound, and focused on advancing business objectives. This improved both participation and perceived value among team members.
- Direct Dialogue on Difficult Topics: Leadership was coached to bring longstanding frustrations and operational challenges into open conversation in a controlled, constructive way. This built momentum toward a healthier conflict culture.
Meanwhile, external corporate dynamics were creating broader organizational changes. Senior leadership shifts across departments were ongoing, though IT leadership remained relatively stable, offering a foundation to build from.
Transformation
The outcomes of this engagement were positive, though bounded by external limitations:
- Achievement of Core Objectives: Leadership alignment improved measurably, communication became more structured and effective, and meetings turned into productive, business-focused sessions.
- Cultural Improvements: Morale and trust within the IT department showed measurable improvement. Leaders and teams demonstrated greater clarity in expectations and showed an increased willingness to engage collaboratively.
- Executive Leadership Impact: The CIO successfully led initiatives to stabilize the situation, reduced financial losses related to production delays, and maintained team integrity through a period of major company transition.
- External Constraints: Broader systemic issues within the corporate structure limited how much transformation was possible at the department level. However, the IT team’s internal improvements positioned them to better navigate these challenges.
Conclusion
In a high-pressure, highly constrained environment, the IT leadership team made tangible progress in restoring alignment, communication, and morale. While external factors placed a ceiling on some outcomes, the department achieved its key objectives, improved internal dynamics, and created a stronger foundation for ongoing performance improvement.
Set up a FREE assessment and discovery today!
“The effectiveness of training is realized in how the organization measures and experiences the results. To create this, organizations must be set free to reach their greatest potential through the leadership of their people.”